Apideck
Embedded Finance Index · 2026·updated 2026-08-11Agent-ready · /llms-full.txt
Global3,902US1,555UK469EU704APAC413MENA142Canada121LATAM159Africa122

What 3,902 fintechs actually run on.

Money moves on open rails. The data behind those movements doesn’t.
Layer disclosure · 3,902 fintechs
% naming ≥1 provider
45.9%
Payments
32.7%
BaaS
20.9%
Sponsor
16.2%
Open Fin
16.0%
Cards
15.9%
FX
12.9%
Lending
5.2%
Ledger
4.8%
Crypto
3.7%
KYC/KYB
3.5%
Insurance
3.2%
Payroll
3.0%
Treasury
1.9%
Fraud
$185BB2B SaaS embedded-payments TAM·<20% captured·BCG + Adyen, Oct 2024
Embedded finance =
Every app is becoming a bank.
Toast moves payments. Shopify writes loans. Lyft issues cards. Brex runs treasury. Airbnb sells flexibility. All of it powered by invisible banks behind a handful of APIs. Once a consumer-neobank story (Chime, Revolut, N26), embedded finance is now the default playbook for vertical SaaS, marketplaces, B2B platforms, and even non-financial brands — anyone who can ship a payment, issue a card, write a loan, or hold a balance without sending users to a third party. The 18-month bank-charter project is now a two-week API integration.
3,902
Companies analyzed
844
Providers
814
Name their sponsor bank
220
Self-banked fintechs

Evidence from subprocessor lists, regulatory footers, trust pages, customer announcements, and ~478 press articles — produced by Apideck with content partners Open Banking Tracker and Embedded Finance Review.

Headline finding ·Stripe is named by 326 of 3,902 fintechs (8.4%) the only vendor above 5% concentration in any infrastructure layer.
For journalists · key findings ↓Browse the dataset ↓
Read the full Embedded Finance Report ↗
For journalists · key findings

Six things this dataset says

Share the headline finding ↗
FINDING 01
5.7× more
companies disclose their sponsor bank than name their KYC vendor (814 vs 144). The compliance layer goes dark by design.
FINDING 02
844
third-party providers serve the 3902 fintechs in the dataset — defined as ≥2 disclosed buyers or recognized Open Banking Tracker vendor.
FINDING 03
220 non-bank fintechs
have crossed from vendor relationship to owned banking, clearing, or card-issuing infrastructure — Square Financial Services, Coinbase, LendingClub Bank and others.
FINDING 04
Zero overlap
between US, UK, and EU BaaS leaders. US: Cross River / Bancorp / Helix by Q2. UK: ClearBank (3× the runner-up) / Modulr / Griffin. EU: Mangopay / Treezor / Solaris.
FINDING 05
US discloses 3-5×
more than other regions. 35% of US fintechs name their sponsor bank vs. 7-21% elsewhere — the widest gap is US vs EU (35% vs 7%). Driven by US regulatory disclosure norms (FDIC member badges, BSA/AML attestations) that don't exist in UK/EU.
FINDING 06
Stripe #1
PSP by disclosed-buyer count (326 of 3902, 8.4%). BaaS leader: Evolve Bank & Trust (64, 1.6%). Most-cited accounting connector: QuickBooks (10.9%).
Section 02 · disclosure rates

Which layers are auditable. Which go dark.

For each layer of the embedded-finance stack: what share of 3,902 analyzed fintechs publicly named a vendor? The gap between the green and red rows is the dark half of the stack — the layers regulators, integrity researchers, and journalists can’t audit from outside.

Layer
% masked ?
% disclosed
PSP (payments)
31.2%masked
45.9%
BaaS
27.4%masked
32.7%
Sponsor bank
2.9%masked
20.9%
Financial data connectivity
6.4%masked
16.2%
Card issuing
29.1%masked
16.0%
FX / payouts
22.4%masked
15.9%
Lending
31.2%masked
12.9%
KYC / identity
0.0%masked
3.7%
Insurance
8.0%masked
3.5%
Payroll
31.7%masked
3.2%
Fraud tools
1.9%
Regulatorily disclosed (named on trust/regulatory surface) Commercially disclosed (named via case studies, partnerships) Trade-secret layer (rarely disclosed publicly)
What this meansThe payments side of the stack is auditable from outside. The risk side isn’t. Public datasets of vendor relationships — including this one — will always over-represent payments and under-represent KYC, fraud, and sanctions screening. Treat the red rows as a floor, not a ceiling. The “% masked” column is the second-order finding: even when a layer IS disclosed, a meaningful fraction of companies talk about their own-brand product (“Acme Pay”, “Acme Checkout”) without identifying the underlying provider. ~34% of fintechs that mention a PSP, and ~37% of fintechs that mention BaaS, hide the actual infrastructure behind a brand wrapper — a structural masking effect that makes the auditable-looking layers thinner than they appear.
Open banking opened the access door to financial data, but access and usability are not the same thing. A full internal transaction record carries around nine usable data points. What comes through an open banking API is typically two, sometimes four.
Ivan Dovica · CEO & Co-founder, Tapix by Dateio
Section 03 · dataset composition

What kind of fintech are these?

The 3,902 fintechs in this dataset split into 9 working categories. Infrastructure providers (BaaS, card issuing, PSP) sit alongside the platforms that consume them (vertical SaaS, marketplaces, B2B fintech) — the report is a snapshot of an ecosystem where buyer and seller often appear in the same chart. 790 entries were excluded as non-fintech (investor/advisory firms, non-financial orgs, press fragments) before this breakdown.

3,902fintechs
Fintech infrastructure
1,369·35.1%
Vertical SaaS
524·13.4%
Consumer neobank
400·10.3%
B2B fintech
304·7.8%
Consumer brand (embedded)
247·6.3%
Marketplace / platform
236·6.0%
Non-fintech org
233·6.0%
Incumbent FI
203·5.2%
Crypto / Web3
158·4.0%
SMB lender
151·3.9%
Insurtech
56·1.4%
Other
21·0.5%
Segments resolved via an enrichment cache + a local-profile fallback classifier sniffing each company’s public industry, tagline, and thesis. “Other” entries are kept in the dataset; we surface them as a visible gap rather than dropping them or guessing.
You’ve reached the teaser

The full report continues with sponsor banks, regional breakdowns, the self-banked club, the BaaS failure cycle, and methodology.

Subscribe for the launch and it lands the day the full index opens. Journalists and analysts who need it sooner: use the press route below.

  • Six more sectionsSponsor banks, regional breakdowns, the self-banked club, the BaaS failure cycle, methodology.
  • The 300-provider landscapeEvery provider we track, by category and disclosed reach.
  • The datasetThe underlying disclosures, so you can check any number yourself.

Puts you on the launch list for the full index — the remaining sections, the PDF and the dataset all land at launch. Built from 3,902 analyzed companies and 4,234 disclosed providers. No newsletter, no sharing your address.

⌘ Press? Email for instant access
By theApideck research team— the unified API platform behind Embedded Finance Index.