ApideckTape
← Embedded Finance Index 2026

Ontic AI

“Can a corporate security operations platform become the system of record for physical and digital threat management the way SIEMs did for cybersecurity?”

Founded2017
HQAustin, Texas, United States
Total raised$286.6M
Latest roundSeries C, $230M (2025)
IndustryVertical SaaS / Corporate Security
The story

Founded 2017 as 'protective intelligence software' for physical threat detection, Ontic has evolved into a broader corporate security operations platform ('Connected Intelligence') that unifies executive protection, incident management, threat intelligence, GSOC, and corporate investigations. The 2025 $230M Series C and FedRAMP Moderate authorization signal a push upmarket into federal/defense and larger enterprise security teams — repositioning from point tool to system-of-record for corporate security.

Last 12 months
2025-Q3
2025
Product timeline
2017
Ontic founded in Austin as a protective intelligence software company for corporate security teams.· founding
2020
Raised $12M Series A led by Felicis Ventures to expand physical threat detection platform.· funding
2025
Raised $230M Series C — one of the largest cybersecurity rounds of Q3 2025.· funding
2025
Achieved FedRAMP Moderate Authorization, opening federal government market.· compliance
The stack
0 layers disclosed in Ontic AI’s embedded-finance stack
Accounting gap: none

Ontic AI — frequently asked

Where is Ontic AI headquartered?

Ontic AI is founded in 2017 and headquartered in Austin, Texas, United States.

How much funding has Ontic AI raised?

Ontic AI has raised $286.6M in total (latest round: Series C, $230M (2025)).

Benchmark your own stack

Request an embedded finance strategy assessment

Get a read on where your own stack stands against Ontic AI and the rest of its category — what they built versus bought, which providers they use, and where the gaps in your own strategy and competitive set actually are.

  • Your category, mappedHow your stack compares to Ontic AI and the other companies in its category.
  • Build vs. buyWhere a provider relationship would close a gap faster than building it.
  • A named analyst, not a form replyA short call to scope what's actually worth assessing for you.

No newsletter, no sharing your address. We use this to reach out about the assessment and nothing else.